14-11-2017 by Freddie del Curatolo
From today, the Supreme Court of Kenya, presided over by Judge David Maraga, is meeting to examine the appeals submitted after the elections-bis of 26th October last year by a former Kenyan parliamentarian and an association for civil rights, plus some petitions against the Opposition accused of having illegally boycotted the same presidential votes, in addition to having prevented the smooth running of the same in some counties of the country.
Maraga presides over the same jury that surprisingly, with a ruling that had no precedent in Africa, annulled the first presidential elections on 1 September last year (guaranteeing the popular, parliamentary and counties elections) for various irregularities of the Electoral Commission IEBC.
As with every election, since three legislatures in this part of the year, there have been appeals and protests this time again, even if after the clashes in the slums of Nairobi and in the strongholds of the candidate Odinga on Lake Victoria they have been limited to the day of the elections and the following day.
For the past two weeks, the situation has been calm and there have been no demonstrations either in the capital or elsewhere.
So, despite the fact that law enforcement agencies have raised the threshold of attention near the Supreme Court and expect sit-in and demonstrations, judges can now work in relative tranquility.
In the first few days they will check all the complaints (which this time are not contained in disproportionate dossiers as in the case of 11 August, when the NASA coalition filed an appeal of 28 thousand pages), then they will ask the parties concerned to read them and prepare their defence pleadings.
All this should take us towards the end of the month, when the Supreme Court will finally meet and decide whether Uhuru Kenyatta can be made official at the Nation as President of Kenya until 2022 or whether for the second time in a row (and this would be a world precedent of all time and all democracies) we will have to return to the polls.
But this time this time within 90 days, then presumably at the end of February, and not only to elect the Head of State.
he Supreme Court of Kenya upheld the appeal of the Opposition represented by Nasa Alliance and its candidate President Raila Odinga, annulling the result of the national elections.
This is an unprecedented fact in a Republic of the African Continent.
The Malindi Court of Appeal was rated as the best in Kenya by the annual Justice Report, drawn up and made public by Justice Chief and President of the Supreme Court of Kenya, David Maraga.
With a "very good" rating,...
by Kenya Tourist Federation
Statement on Supreme Court Ruling: Kenya Presidential Election Petition
Following the general elections on the 8/8/2017 which declared the sitting President the winner, the opposition filed a case at the Supreme Court seeking redress with a view of nullifying the...
This weekend, we will know something definitive about Kenya's political future.
The elections of August 8th left the bottom line of the appeal filed by the opposition before the Supreme Court, represented by the NASA alliance and its candidate premier...
"These elections are to be canceled and Kenyatta has to be sent home, but we ask our people to be quiet and not to come down in the square at least for now."
Raila Odinga and his NASA alliance, who according...
In the end, common sense prevailed.
Probably in front of the chaos of the day following the proclamation of the new president and the animosity of his faction, Raila Odinga preferred not to heat up the minds of that part...
A lesson in democracy for the whole of Africa and the whole world.
This is how the decision of the Supreme Court of Kenya was defined by the members of the political alliance NASA, which was accepted a few hours...
Among all the possible institutional or associative components of Kenya that were awaited today at the Supreme Court, Harun Mwau, a former member of parliament and constitutionalist, has emerged....